Polyaspartic acid

News

  • Home
  • Research Methods in Biomineralization Science

apr . 09, 2024 10:57 Back to list

Research Methods in Biomineralization Science

PILP was first found for the CaCO3 system when μg/mL amounts of polyaspartic or polyacrylic acid were added to a CaCl2 solution, which was then transferred into an ammonium carbonate gas diffusion setup (see Section 2.1 for description) (Gower & Tirrell, 1998). The PILP droplets grow up to the micrometer range and can be observed with a conventional light microscope. This also allows one to observe the crystallization process. Especially useful in this respect is polarization microscopy, which enables one to detect a crystal via its birefringence. Unfortunately, the gas diffusion method is not very reproducible and the results depend not only on the size of the vessels, surface area, and other parameters but also on the age of the ammonium carbonate itself, which determines its activity to release CO2. The precise nature of the PILP formation process is still unknown, which could be a result of the difficulty to isolate PILP phases that are very unstable towards crystallization. PILP was meanwhile described for other inorganic systems as well, like calcium phosphate. However, the droplets are very small in that case and cannot be observed under a light microscope.

PILP can also be formed for organic molecular crystals. For these systems, they are much more stable against crystallization compared to their inorganic counterparts. This is likely an effect of the lower lattice energy of organic systems resulting in reduced crystallization tendency. Organic PILP has been described for glutamic acid, lysine, and histidine (Wohlrab, Cölfen, & Antonietti, 2005) as well as an organic azo pigment (Ma et al., 2009). In these cases, the PILP phase could be isolated and its composition analyzed (Wohlrab et al., 2005), showing that a substantial amount of the polymer is included in the PILP phase. What is needed for the generation of the organic PILP phase is a strongly interacting polymer. In case of charged amino acids, this can be a polyelectrolyte with opposite charge. An example is polyethyleneimine, which generates PILP with glutamic acid. Or in case of the azo pigment, a block copolymer was used with one block modified with parts of the pigment molecule, which also maintained a strong interaction between the polymer additive and the crystallizing molecules. When PILP droplets of organic molecules are left to crystallize without further manipulation, they can form porous microspheres as shown in Fig. 13.9. The pigment example also shows that the amount of strongly interacting polymer is very low. In that case, the molar ratio of the polymer to crystallizing molecule was 1:430. If PILPs are used to generate thin films, these films can have a hierarchical structure and can also be mesocrystalline (Jiang, Gong, Volkmer, Gower, & Coelfen, 2011; Jiang et al., 2013). The biggest disadvantage of PILP is that it is only present in a very small region of the phase diagram, as shown in the phase diagram of the glutamic acid–polyethyleneimine system (Jiang, Gower, Volkmer, & Coelfen, 2012). Since this is the solvent-rich region in the phase diagram with only a small amount of the crystallizing component, it is not possible to generate large amounts of PILP to use them in large-scale applications.

Ethylene Diamine Tetraacetate Acid Tetrasodium Salt (EDTA-4Na)

Sign in to download full-size image

Figure 13.9. SEM images at different magnifications of pigment microspheres of nanoplates obtained in mixed solvents of water and isopropanol (50:50, v/v) via a block copolymer ABABA-acetoacetyl-PEI-b-PEG. The molar ratio of PY181 and ABABA-acetoacetyl-PEI-b-PEG was about 430:1.

Figure reproduced from Ma et al. (2009) with permission of Wiley-VCH.
Share

If you are interested in our products, you can choose to leave your information here, and we will be in touch with you shortly.


bs_BABosnian